The Pygmalion and Rosenthal effects are pivotal psychological concepts that demonstrate how the expectations of others can profoundly influence an individual’s performance and behavior. These effects are not only critical for understanding everyday social dynamics but are especially significant in high-stakes environments such as education, military training, and leadership development. At the core of both effects is the remarkable power of the subconscious mind in responding to external cues, particularly those related to expectations. The ways in which people interpret and internalize these expectations can ultimately shape their reality, affecting both psychological and physiological outcomes.
This article delves into the origins, mechanisms, and implications of the Pygmalion and Rosenthal effects, offering a comprehensive exploration of their influence across various domains. By examining these effects within the framework of the Self Matrix, with a focus on the Cognitive Self and the Subconscious Mind, we can better understand how expectations drive personal growth, resilience, and performance. Whether in the classroom, on the battlefield, or within the workplace, these phenomena provide powerful insights into how belief in potential—both one’s own and that of others—can foster excellence.
The Pygmalion Effect: Expectations and Performance
Origins and Conceptual Understanding
The Pygmalion Effect is named after the mythological figure Pygmalion, a sculptor who fell in love with a statue he had carved, which was then brought to life by the goddess Aphrodite. The psychological concept emerged from the groundbreaking study conducted by Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson in 1968. Their experiment, famously known as “Pygmalion in the Classroom,” revealed that teachers’ expectations about their students’ abilities could influence the students’ academic performance. In this study, teachers were told that certain students (randomly chosen) were likely to show significant intellectual growth. As a result, these students did indeed perform better academically, highlighting the power of expectations in shaping outcomes (Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1968).
Mechanisms of the Pygmalion Effect
The Pygmalion Effect operates through several interconnected psychological mechanisms:
- Behavioral Confirmation: Teachers or authority figures unconsciously behave in ways that align with their expectations. For example, they might give more attention, encouragement, and support to those they believe will succeed. This behavior reinforces the expected outcome, leading to improved performance by the individual (Jussim & Harber, 2005).
- Self-Perception and Internalization: Individuals often internalize the expectations placed upon them by others. When people perceive that others expect them to succeed, they are more likely to adopt a positive self-perception, increasing their motivation and effort to meet those expectations (Merton, 1948).
- Feedback Loops: Positive feedback, both verbal and non-verbal, plays a critical role in the Pygmalion Effect. Individuals receiving positive reinforcement are more likely to continue striving for success, creating a self-reinforcing loop that sustains high performance (Eden, 1984).
The Pygmalion Effect in High-Stakes Military Environments
High-stakes military training environments, such as special forces selection programs, are particularly well-suited to illustrate the Pygmalion Effect. These programs push candidates to their mental and physical limits through rigorous challenges and stressors. While the goal is often to eliminate individuals deemed “unfit,” leadership expectations powerfully shape candidate performance. These expectations demonstrate the strong connection between mental resilience and external cues under extreme pressure.
Research on Military Settings
Eden and Shani (1982) showed that leaders who maintain higher expectations of their subordinates foster improved performance in military boot camps. This is typically achieved through behavioral reinforcement—leaders provide more guidance, encouragement, or opportunities for success. Subtle cues, such as instructors displaying confidence or familiarity with certain trainees, can enhance mental resilience and endurance under pressure. This is supported by McNatt’s (2000) meta-analysis, which confirms that leader expectations enhance performance across various demanding contexts, including military environments.
The Golem Effect
Conversely, the Golem Effect, the negative counterpart of the Pygmalion Effect, can have devastating consequences in elite military training. McNatt (2000) notes that when instructors hold lower expectations of candidates, the trainees often internalize these negative perceptions, leading to self-doubt and reduced motivation. In high-stakes environments, this can lead to underperformance—not because of any inherent physical or psychological limitations, but due to the psychological burden of feeling unsupported. This highlights the importance of leadership support and perceived confidence in shaping outcomes.
Specific Applications in Elite Military Programs
Bartone et al. (2008) found that psychological hardiness—a trait linked to stress resilience—predicts success in U.S. Army Special Forces candidates. Although hardiness is a key predictor, leadership expectations likely reinforce or weaken this trait. Candidates exposed to positive leadership cues—such as instructors displaying confidence in their abilities—are more likely to believe in their potential to succeed. This aligns with the broader literature on the Pygmalion Effect, where belief in one’s capabilities leads to improved performance under duress.
Moreover, Karakowsky, DeGama, and McBey (2012) highlight the critical role of perceived leader support in high-pressure situations like BUD/S. Trainees who feel psychologically supported by their instructors tend to internalize positive beliefs about their capabilities, resulting in improved performance through increased effort and resilience. Even in environments where stress is constant, leadership support becomes a silent but powerful determinant of success.
Stress Mindset Theory
The stress mindset theory adds another dimension to this discussion. Crum, Salovey, and Achor (2013) demonstrated that individuals who view stress as a challenge rather than a threat, tend to perform better in high-stakes environments. This stress-is-enhancing mindset is closely linked to the Pygmalion Effect, as leadership expectations influence how stress is perceived. Smith, Young, and Crum (2020) found that Navy SEAL candidates who perceived positive expectations from their instructors were more likely to adopt a stress-is-enhancing mindset. This mindset shift led to improved resilience, coping strategies, and performance under pressure.
Leadership expectations may also facilitate neurobiological shifts, leading to more adaptive responses to stress. Neurobiologically, this occurs through the activation of brain regions like the prefrontal cortex and limbic system, which regulate cognitive control and emotional responses, allowing stress to be reappraised as a challenge rather than a threat (Crum et al., 2013).
Leadership and Stress Reappraisal
Jamieson et al. (2010) found that individuals who receive positive feedback and guidance from authority figures are more likely to cognitively reappraise stress as beneficial. This reappraisal process links directly to the Pygmalion Effect, as leadership expectations help trainees reinterpret stress, leading to better outcomes in environments like BUD/S, where stress is pervasive.
Military-Specific Studies
Military-specific studies provide direct evidence of the Pygmalion Effect in action. Shamir and Ben-Ari (2000) explored how leadership behaviors in elite Israeli military units influence soldier performance under extreme conditions. Their research shows that leaders who project confidence and set high expectations create environments where soldiers are more likely to overcome adversity. This parallels the BUD/S experience, where leadership expectations drive candidates to exceed their perceived limitations.
Lastly, a report by the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (2017) emphasizes the impact of leadership on stress management and performance in elite military training. Subtle leadership cues can reinforce candidates’ belief in their ability to succeed, particularly in environments that continually test both physical and mental limits. This finding aligns with the Pygmalion Effect in extreme military training, reinforcing the idea that even small expressions of confidence from leaders can significantly influence performance.
Neurobiological Underpinnings
Recent research has provided valuable insights into the neurobiological mechanisms behind the Pygmalion Effect, revealing how expectations influence brain function and performance. Central to this process is the brain’s dopaminergic system, which is responsible for reward processing. Positive feedback and reinforcement, particularly when aligned with expectations from authority figures, activate dopamine pathways. This activation enhances motivation by providing both psychological and physiological rewards, reinforcing behaviors that contribute to success (Schultz, 2015; Schultz et al., 2016). This feedback loop strengthens the idea that expectations can drive sustained effort and improved performance, as individuals experience both psychological and physiological benefits for meeting or exceeding these expectations.
Cognitive Control and the Prefrontal Cortex
The prefrontal cortex—the region of the brain involved in cognitive control, decision-making, and goal-directed behavior—also plays a critical role in modulating responses to expectations. While Miller and Cohen (2001) outlined how the prefrontal cortex regulates cognitive control under pressure, further research suggests that external cues, such as leadership expectations, can heighten this responsiveness. These external influences enhance focus and precision in executing tasks, especially in high-pressure environments (Miller & Cohen, 2001; Barbey et al., 2013).
Emotional Regulation and the Limbic System
Additionally, the limbic system, which governs emotional regulation, works in tandem with the prefrontal cortex to reappraise stress as a challenge rather than a threat. This interaction between cognitive and emotional systems enables individuals to maintain composure and optimize performance under pressure. Crum, Salovey, and Achor (2013) demonstrated that positive expectations help shift stress perceptions, a process neurobiologically rooted in the brain’s ability to regulate emotional responses through reappraisal, particularly in challenging situations.
These findings highlight the profound connection between psychological expectations and neurobiological processes. Specific leadership cues—such as expressed belief in an individual’s abilities—not only influence behavioral outcomes but also shape the brain’s response to stress, allowing individuals to perform better under pressure.
The Rosenthal Effect: Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement
The Rosenthal Effect in Educational Settings
The Rosenthal Effect, a specific manifestation of the Pygmalion Effect, refers to the phenomenon where teachers’ expectations about students’ abilities can influence those students’ academic outcomes. This effect has been extensively studied in educational psychology and has profound implications for teaching practices and student development. Teachers who hold high expectations for their students are more likely to create a learning environment that fosters academic growth. This includes providing more challenging material, offering more frequent and constructive feedback, and displaying a greater willingness to engage with students (Rosenthal, 2002).
Long-Term Implications
The long-term implications of the Rosenthal Effect are significant. Students and trainees in various settings consistently exposed to high expectations from teachers, trainers, or educators are more likely to develop a strong sense of self-efficacy, which is the belief in their ability to succeed. This self-efficacy is a critical predictor of long-term academic and professional success (Bandura, 1997). Conversely, students subjected to low expectations may experience decreased motivation, lower self-esteem, and a higher likelihood of academic or other underachievement (Brophy, 1983).
Broader Social and Cultural Impacts
The Rosenthal Effect also has broader social and cultural implications. In diverse educational settings, teachers’ expectations can be influenced by stereotypes and biases, leading to differential treatment of students based on race, gender, or socioeconomic status. This can perpetuate systemic inequalities and reinforce negative stereotypes. Addressing these biases and promoting equitable expectations is crucial for fostering an inclusive and supportive learning environment (Jussim, 2012).
Psychological and Cognitive Underpinnings
The Role of the Subconscious Mind
The Pygmalion and Rosenthal effects are deeply rooted in the workings of the subconscious mind. The subconscious is particularly attuned to external cues, especially those related to social expectations. These cues can influence behavior and performance in ways that are not always consciously recognized. The subconscious mind processes these cues and translates them into actions that align with the expectations placed upon the individual (Bargh & Chartrand, 1999).
Behavioral Conditioning and Reinforcement
The Pygmalion and Rosenthal effects can also be understood through the principles of behavioral conditioning. Positive expectations act as a form of positive reinforcement, encouraging individuals to engage in behaviors that fulfill those expectations. Over time, these reinforced behaviors become ingrained, leading to lasting changes in performance and self-concept (Skinner, 1953).
The Impact on Self-Concept and Identity
The effects of expectations extend beyond performance; they also shape an individual’s self-concept and identity. When people consistently receive positive reinforcement based on high expectations, they begin to view themselves as capable and competent. This positive self-concept can influence all areas of life, from academic achievement to interpersonal relationships and career success (Markus & Nurius, 1986).
Implications for Personal Development and Leadership
Harnessing the Pygmalion Effect for Personal Growth
Understanding the Pygmalion Effect offers valuable insights for personal development. By consciously setting high expectations for oneself and others, individuals can create a positive feedback loop that enhances motivation, effort, and overall performance. This approach can be applied to various aspects of life, including goal setting, habit formation, and self-improvement (Dweck, 2006).
Leadership and Organizational Success
In organizational settings, the Pygmalion and Rosenthal effects underscore the importance of positive leadership. Leaders who believe in the potential of their team members are more likely to inspire higher performance, creativity, and innovation. By fostering a culture of high expectations and support, leaders can drive organizational success and employee satisfaction (Schein, 2010).
Educational Practices and Social Equity
The implications of the Rosenthal Effect for education are profound. Teachers and educators must be aware of their own expectations and the potential impact on their students. By setting equitable and high expectations for all students, educators can help close achievement gaps and promote social equity in educational outcomes. This is particularly important in addressing systemic biases and fostering an inclusive educational environment (Jussim, 2012).
Conclusion
The Pygmalion and Rosenthal effects demonstrate the extraordinary power of expectations in shaping reality. These effects highlight the importance of positive reinforcement, belief in potential, and the influential role of authority figures in educational, professional, and personal contexts. By understanding and harnessing these effects, individuals and leaders can foster environments that promote growth, excellence, and fulfillment.
Bibliography
Barbey, A. K., Colom, R., Paul, E. J., & Grafman, J. (2013). “Architectonic foundations of human intelligence.” NeuroImage, 79, 309-318.
Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist. [Online] 54 (7), 462–479.
Bartone, P. T., Roland, R. R., Picano, J. J., & Williams, T. J. (2008). Psychological Hardiness Predicts Success in US Army Special Forces Candidates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(1), 78-81.
Brophy, J. E. (1983) Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology. [Online] 75 (5), 631–661.
Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716-733.
Dweck, C. S. (2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY, US: Random House.
Eden, D. (1984) Self-Fulfilling Prophecy as a Management Tool: Harnessing Pygmalion. The Academy of Management Review. [Online] 9 (1), 64–73.
Eden, D. and Shani, A.B. (1982) ‘Pygmalion goes to boot camp: Expectancy, leadership, and trainee performance’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), pp. 194–199.
Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., Blackstock, E., & Schmader, T. (2010). Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 208-212.
Jussim, L. & Harber, K. D. (2005) Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review. [Online] 9 (2), 131–155.
Karakowsky, L., DeGama, N., and McBey, K. (2012) ‘Facilitating the Pygmalion effect: The overlooked role of subordinate perceptions of the leader’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(4), pp. 579–599.
Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1986) Possible selves. American Psychologist. [Online] 41 (9), 954–969.
McNatt, D. B. (2000). Ancient Pygmalion Joins Contemporary Management: A Meta-Analysis of the Pygmalion Effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 314-322.
Miller, E. K. & Cohen, J. D. (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience. [Online] 24167–202.
Rosenthal, R. & Jacobson, L. (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York, NY, US: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Rosenthal, R. (2002) Covert communication in classrooms, clinics, courtrooms, and cubicles. American Psychologist. [Online] 57 (11), 839–849.
Schein, E. H. (2010) Google-Books-ID: Mnres2PlFLMC. Organizational Culture and Leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
Schultz, W. (2015) Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data. Physiological Reviews. [Online] 95 (3), 853–951.
Schultz, W., Stauffer, W. R., & Lak, A. (2016). “Dopamine reward prediction error responses reflect marginal utility.” Current Biology, 26(1), 56-62.
Shamir, B., & Ben-Ari, E. (2000). Leadership in an Open Army: From the Battlefield to the Office. In P. Smith (Ed.), Leadership at the Frontline (pp. 245-265). Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, E., Young, M., and Crum, A. (2020) ‘Stress, mindsets, and success in Navy SEALs special warfare training’, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, p. 2962.
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). (2017). Leadership Studies. TRADOC Research Publications.
U.S. Department of the Army. (2007). Performance under Stress: Improving the Ability of Soldiers to Perform under Extreme Stress. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Bandura, A. (1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
